Authors:

W. LaJean Chaffin (Texas Tech University Health Science Center)

Patrick Wallis (London School of Economics and Political Science)

Abstract:

Apprenticeship in London was the concern of both livery company and city institutions. In this article, we connect evidence about the petitions submitted by apprentices to the Lord Mayor’s Court for early discharge from their indentures with the entries recording their apprenticeship and freedom surviving in the records of Goldsmiths’ Company. Each contains a distinct set of complementary information about apprenticeship in London. By positioning appeals to the Lord Mayor’s Court against the company’s records of youths’ trajectories through apprenticeship, we can expand our understanding of the contractual framework of training and associated enforcement mechanisms in early modern London. As we show, the Court was used to negotiate with masters, as well as to terminate contracts. Quitting an apprenticeship through the court did mildly ‘scar’ the chances of youths (not masters), but the Court process appears to have largely protected reputations. Finally, we provide the first estimate of gaps in livery company registration of apprentices, particularly female apprentices.

Keywords: apprenticeship, labour, training, guilds, dispute resolution, courts, Goldsmiths, youth

Published on The London Journal, Issue 2, 2023.

Open access and free to download: https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2022.2152976